Barnstars - coding schema: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
| Zeile 46: | Zeile 46: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| − | + | |+article editing | |
|- | |- | ||
|EG | |EG | ||
Version vom 14. November 2019, 19:13 Uhr
| Author | David W. McDonald |
|---|---|
| Research questions | How are Barnstars used in Wikipedia? How are people awarded with Barnstars? |
| Method | Qualitative codin |
| Theoretical background | The codebook contains three groups of codes: (1) the scope
of the barnstar, such as whether it points to a specific edit or comments on general contributions to Wikipedia, (2) the genre of the barnstar, such as whether it is antagonistic, and (3) the work that the barnstar acknowledges. |
| Process of creation | codebook by open coding a random sample of 200 barnstars.
We then applied the codebook to a second random sample of 200 barnstars. Through our attempt to systematically code the second barnstar sample, we iteratively refined our codes and agreed upon their application to the barnstars. |
| Dimensionalization and coding cycles | We used this codebook to iteratively code a random sample of 2400 barnstars. The barnstars were divided randomly into six bins. Two of the authors independently coded each bin. One coder reviewed the codes and noted discrepencies. Discrepencies were iterated upon until there was consensus. After coding was completed, we performed extensive consistency checking of commonly correlated codes.
A barnstar often suggests multiple legitimate codings, either because a particular phrasing calls out multiple dimensions or because the barnstar contains multiple independent statements. We therefore chose to apply multiple codes for every code group instead of force-fitting a dominant code. For example, the following barnstar provides evidence of a prior encounter and serves as a peace offering (genre), while acknowledging general administratative actions, committment to the project, and conflict mediation (work) |
| Date | 2008 |
| Research area | Information Science |
| Inter-coder-reliability | 85% |
| Keywords | Wikipedia, CSCW |
| Visualizations | |
| Software | NVivo |
| Coding schema | Datei:Codes.xml |
| Project data | Datei:Codes.xml |
| Research data | Barnstars - research data |
| Publication | Articulations of WikiWork, Finding Patterns in Behavioral Observations by Automatically Labeling Forms of Wikiwork in Barnstars |
| Study | Barnstar Study |
<imagemap>-Fehler: Bild ist ungültig oder nicht vorhanden
black: Has Successor
| EG | general editing |
| EMAJ | contributions-major (MAJOR CHANGES TO TEXT; some kind of large refinement or improvement to the article) |
EMED contributions-media (images, audio, graphic design work, photos, latex) EINI initiative (starting an article, work on article stubs) ERED redesign / restructuring (refactoring, merging pages) EMIN minor (cleanup, copy-editing, maintenance, work on captions, work on a single article) EACH achievement (FA, FP, GA, DYK, readable) ECLA classification (categorization, disambiguating links, redirects) EATT attribution (adding references; removing unattributable information) ETRA translation (to another language) EEXT external research (doing outside research in order to make quality contributions)
collaborative actions/disposition (individual attribute) CG general collaborative CDA diplomatic-action (working toward concensus, mediation) CDD diplomatic-disposition (staying cool, civility, maintaining sense of humor, accepting of criticism, cooperative/collaborative) CEXP explanation (instance of explanation; to newcomers, of particular area of expertise, intricacy of policy) CADH adherence (to policy, maintaining NPOV, balancing policies, academic integrity)
meta content MG general meta MPRO programming artifacts (external tools, bots) MCLA classification (category creation, refactoring) MPOL policy / formal process (creation, refactoring, elaboration) MTEM template (creation, refactoring, barnstars, page templates, userboxes, DYK) MFOR forums / portals (creation, maintenance) MARC archiving (user talk pages, discussion pages)
border patrol BG general border BVG vandal fighting-general BVU vandal fighting-user pages vandal fighting on a user or user talk page BVT vandal fighting-talk pages vandal fighting on an article talk page BVW vandal fighting-wp pages vandal fighting on a WikiProject or other WP administrative page BVA vandal fighting-articles vandal fighting on an article page BSO sockpuppet detection (requests for check user (CU, RFCU), sleuthing) BDEL deletion (notability application, AfD, spam removal, speedy deletion, saving page from deletion) BLEG legal (copyright patrol)
social / community (attribute realized with others) must note something about the person!
SG general social (for being you…, model wikipedian)
ST teaching others (mentorship; being an accessible resource for people (e.g. reference desk); giving constructive criticism about another user's behaviors (e.g. in an Editor Review))
SR rewarding others (giving out barnstars)
SW welcoming newbies
SU user page design (helping design someone else's userpage, having a nice user page)
SL leadership (starting wikiprojects, esperanza, improvement drives, information portals)
SH humor and cheer (for cheering someone up, for being funny)
SE expertise/knowledge (for bringing unique knowledge or experience to bear)
SC committment (recognizing temporal commitment to some article, community, etc)
SD defense standing up for another Wikipedian's good name; standing up 'gainst the man
administrative / formal process formal process/action needs to be explicitely mentioned!
AG general administrative (AN/I)
AC content acknowledgement (FA, FP, GA, FAC)
AD dispute resolution (RfC, RfM, RfArbitration)
AA administrative action (locking pages, blocking users, accountname changes)
AP privilege granting (RfAdminship)
AB border patrol (AfD, VfD, RFCU, CU=check user)
misc / unknown UM general misc (general contributions / unspecific mop and bucket or janitorial services) US status attainment (status attainment (e.g. adminship), individual milestone (e.g. edit count, anniversary)) UN none (no work acknowledged; e.g. sorry you were a victim of vandalism, here's a piece of cake) UU unknown (not enough information; e.g. "barnstar 5")
